Indian psychology does not treat the mind as a single faculty, and the distinction between manas and buddhi is the most practically useful of its divisions. Manas is the gathering and processing function: it receives what the senses deliver, moves rapidly between options, entertains possibilities, and characteristically doubts. Buddhi is the discriminating function: it evaluates, determines, and arrives at a conclusion. Manas asks; buddhi decides.
Setting them out this way makes ordinary indecision legible. The experience of knowing perfectly well what should be done and not doing it is buddhi having reached a determination that manas continues to relitigate, supplying fresh objections faster than they can be dismissed. The classical prescription is not to suppress manas, which is what it is for, but to establish buddhi as the deciding authority, since a manas that is treated as the final word will never stop generating alternatives.
The Katha Upanishad supplies the standard image. The body is a chariot, the senses are horses, manas is the reins, buddhi is the charioteer, and the self is the passenger. The reins are essential and are not the driver, and a chariot in which the reins are making the decisions goes wherever the horses were already heading. These two are part of a larger fourfold apparatus, set out in full under Antahkarana, which adds memory and the sense of I to the account.
Manas and buddhi turn inner conflict from a character flaw into a structural description. To see the complete four-fold instrument, explore more of The Living Sanatan Timeline.
Part 11 of 100 — Series II: To the Eternal
Series II: To the EternalThe Five KoshasIndexFAQThe Timeline