Maya gets flattened, in casual usage, into a single claim: the world is an illusion, meaning it is not really there. This is a genuine misreading. Advaita Vedanta does not claim the world is nothing. A table you can set your cup on is doing real work; it is not comparable to a mirage that vanishes on approach. What maya names is more specific: the world is real at the level of ordinary experience, but it is not real in the same, unconditioned sense that Brahman is real. It has a dependent, borrowed kind of reality rather than no reality at all.
The standard illustration is a rope mistaken for a snake in dim light. The fear the mistake produces is genuine fear, with a real physiological effect. But the snake itself was never there; what was there, the entire time, was a rope. Maya is not the claim that there was nothing to see. It is the claim that what is being seen is being mistaken for something other than what it fundamentally is, and that the mistake, while completely convincing from inside it, does not survive closer inspection.
This distinction matters because it changes what liberation is supposed to accomplish. If the world were a pure illusion in the sense of being simply absent, liberation would mean the world stops existing, which no tradition actually claims happens to a living liberated person. What changes, on the maya account, is not the world but the seeing: the rope is recognised as a rope, without the rope needing to disappear for that recognition to occur.
This still leaves an obvious question hanging: if the world is not simply an illusion, what exactly is producing the mistake, and where does that mistake sit, in the world or in the one perceiving it? That question is what separates maya, the cosmic-scale version of the covering, from avidya, its more personal counterpart, taken up next.
Part 35 of 100 — Series I: From the Beginning
Series I: From the BeginningThe Five KoshasIndexFAQThe Timeline